Re: Others applying patch queue patches

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Others applying patch queue patches
Date: 2004-09-17 03:18:12
Message-ID: 15678.1095391092@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> Neil Conway wrote:
>> On Thu, 2004-09-16 at 23:24, Bruce Momjian wrote:
>>> It will be applied as soon as one of the PostgreSQL committers reviews
>>> and approves it.
>>
>> does this reflect a change in the patch application procedures?

In my mind this is just a clearer statement of what the policy always
was ;-). The patch review/application load was never supposed to fall
entirely on Bruce. The list he maintains is just there to ensure that
nothing slips through the cracks.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2004-09-17 03:37:53 Re: PL/PgSQL "bare" function calls
Previous Message Neil Conway 2004-09-17 02:25:24 Re: PL/PgSQL "bare" function calls