Re: [Re] Re: PREPARE and transactions

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)dcc(dot)uchile(dot)cl>
Cc: Cyril VELTER <cyril(dot)velter(at)metadys(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [Re] Re: PREPARE and transactions
Date: 2004-06-24 17:13:42
Message-ID: 15671.1088097222@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)dcc(dot)uchile(dot)cl> writes:
> This is why I proposed originally to keep the non-transactional behavior
> for Parse messages, but transactional for SQL PREPARE. The latter can
> be said to be inside the transaction and should behave like so. I think
> this lowers the surprise factor.

It seems like we are closing in on an agreement that that is what should
happen.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2004-06-24 17:29:13 Re: bug in GUC
Previous Message Tom Lane 2004-06-24 16:59:43 Re: 7.5-dev, pg_dumpall, dollarquoting