Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> writes:
>> Both heap_expand_tuple() and minimal_expand_tuple() being unused, make
>> expand_tuple() unused in turn.
>> I think we probably ought to remove all three in 20? I didn't find external
>> callers. It's nontrivial enough code that I don't think we should keep it
>> around just because somebody might be using it.
... BTW, upon looking at the code coverage report to confirm these
are unused, I noticed that the adjacent heap_copytuple_with_tuple is
also unreferenced.
regards, tom lane