Re: CommitFest 2009-09, two weeks on

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: CommitFest 2009-09, two weeks on
Date: 2009-09-30 15:36:40
Message-ID: 15654.1254325000@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> writes:
> OTOH, I'd hate to hold the commitfest hostage for that. Perhaps it
> should be returned to author at this point, I should move on to other
> patches to get the commitfest closed ASAP, and continue reviewing and
> polishing that right after the commitfest.

FWIW, I'd rather you kept focusing on those two patches while other
committers work on the rest. From what I've seen you're finding a
whole lot of broken or at least questionable stuff, and even if they're
individually minor issues, that adds up to a lot of instability.

I agree that these patches need special attention and should not be
treated exactly the same as we'd treat smaller patches.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Heikki Linnakangas 2009-09-30 15:45:49 Re: Hot Standby on git
Previous Message Tom Lane 2009-09-30 15:19:35 Re: TODO item: Allow more complex user/database default GUC settings