Re: BLOBs

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Eugene Yin <eugeneymail(at)ymail(dot)com>
Cc: "pgsql-sql(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-sql(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: BLOBs
Date: 2016-01-10 07:12:42
Message-ID: 15645.1452409962@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-sql

Eugene Yin <eugeneymail(at)ymail(dot)com> writes:
> The following statement is excerpted from the
> "Oracle to Postgres Conversion"
> https://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/Oracle_to_Postgres_Conversion#Grammar_Differences

My goodness, that's out of date (as you should have guessed from the
reference to "scheduled for an overhaul in summer 2000"). pg_dump
has been able to dump large objects just fine since 8.1 or so.

I don't know what else an Oracle user might be expecting that we don't
have, though, so I'm hesitant to change the text.

regards, tom lane

In response to

  • BLOBs at 2016-01-10 06:20:02 from Eugene Yin

Responses

  • Re: BLOBs at 2016-01-11 00:37:52 from Eugene Yin

Browse pgsql-sql by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Eugene Yin 2016-01-11 00:37:52 Re: BLOBs
Previous Message Eugene Yin 2016-01-10 06:20:02 BLOBs