| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
| Cc: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>, Kevin Grittner <kgrittn(at)ymail(dot)com>, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: binworld and install-binworld targets - was Re: Release note bloat is getting out of hand |
| Date: | 2015-02-04 23:53:43 |
| Message-ID: | 15599.1423094023@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> writes:
> On 2/4/15 2:24 PM, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
>> On 02/03/2015 10:00 AM, David Fetter wrote:
>>> On 02/03/2015 08:55 AM, Kevin Grittner wrote:
>>>> I realize this is slightly OT, but I wonder if it might be worth having
>>>> targets that build and install everything but the docs.
>> Here's a tiny patch for that
> Not excited about that name. (Does "bin" include "lib?")
Yeah, doesn't seem quite right to me either.
> If we're reshuffling, how about renaming world to all, and adding
> all-no-doc or something similarly explicit?
-1 for renaming any existing targets; that's quite likely to cause
packagers pain, for little gain IMO.
> Or maybe use a make variable, like NO_DOC. I think that's preferable to
> adding more targets.
Unless we can come up with a new target name that obviously means
"world minus docs", the make-variable idea may be the best.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | David Steele | 2015-02-05 00:16:20 | Re: Redesigning checkpoint_segments |
| Previous Message | Corey Huinker | 2015-02-04 23:06:02 | Re: [POC] FETCH limited by bytes. |