| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Petr Jelinek <petr(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: VS 2015 support in src/tools/msvc |
| Date: | 2016-03-05 05:46:55 |
| Message-ID: | 15559.1457156815@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> On Sat, Mar 5, 2016 at 1:41 PM, Petr Jelinek <petr(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
>> I vote for just using sed considering we need flex and bison anyway.
> OK cool, we could go with something else than sed to generate probes.h
> but that seems sensible considering that this should definitely be
> back-patched. Not sure what the others think about adding a new file
> in the source tarball by default though.
AFAIK, sed flex and bison originate from three separate source projects;
there is no reason to suppose that the presence of flex and bison on a
particular system guarantee the presence of sed. I thought the proposal
to get rid of the psed dependence in favor of some more perl code was
pretty sane.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Amit Langote | 2016-03-05 07:24:11 | Re: [PROPOSAL] VACUUM Progress Checker. |
| Previous Message | Michael Paquier | 2016-03-05 05:39:00 | Re: VS 2015 support in src/tools/msvc |