Re: Function with default value not replacing old definition of the function

From: Dimitri Fontaine <dfontaine(at)hi-media(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: "Pavel Stehule" <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>, "Rushabh Lathia" <rushabh(dot)lathia(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, rushabh(dot)lathia(at)enterprisedb(dot)com
Subject: Re: Function with default value not replacing old definition of the function
Date: 2008-12-11 20:51:11
Message-ID: 15544781-9E39-41EE-B242-5AF7AB99DF53@hi-media.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Le 11 déc. 08 à 21:23, Tom Lane a écrit :
> It's not that easy to produce a message that wouldn't be annoying
> noise.

Something really amazing in PostgreSQL is the HINTs system in error
messages. Almost all the time thoses messages are focused and helping.
I'd see this warning as a HINT maybe:
WARNING: variadic function xxx(int, int[]) already exists
HINT: you would rather not to mask it

Well, I'm not sure WARNING HINTS are supported, it's more a way to
better explain the idea than anything else.

The bottom line was that I'm betting DBA would be happy to know and
wouldn't consider it annoying noise, and for the kind of "Please, I
know what I'm doing" DBAs, maybe some kind of warning_level GUC would
be desirable?

> In particular, it's hard to know whether functions in different
> schemas
> would represent a problem or not.

I'd still vote in favor of the NOTICE/WARNING. I know I'd be happy to
have my beloved PostgreSQL being attentive and focused when maybe I'm
not. Even if this time I was.

Regards,
- --
dim

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (Darwin)

iEYEARECAAYFAklBfT8ACgkQlBXRlnbh1bnCaACfUoRUx+7sADsb13YqQR0PWAho
dKUAoJZCoIzxstAXMRa4VejFkjgdk2jk
=REM9
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2008-12-11 20:57:22 Re: benchmarking the query planner
Previous Message Tom Lane 2008-12-11 20:23:52 Re: Function with default value not replacing old definition of the function