Re: Planning counters in pg_stat_statements (using pgss_store)

From: legrand legrand <legrand_legrand(at)hotmail(dot)com>
To: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Planning counters in pg_stat_statements (using pgss_store)
Date: 2019-03-27 20:36:08
Message-ID: 1553718968249-0.post@n3.nabble.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

>> - trailing whitespaces and comments wider than 80 characters
>> not fixed

> why? In case it's not clear, I'm talking about the .c file, not the
> regression tests.

I work on a poor msys install on windows 7, where perl is broken ;o(
So no pgindent available.
Will fix that later, or as soon as I get a pgindent diff.

>> - "Assert(planning_time > 0 && total_time > 0);"
>> moved at the beginning of pgss_store

> Have you tried to actually compile postgres and pg_stat_statements
> with --enable-cassert? This test can *never* be true, since you
> either provide the planning time or the execution time or neither. As
> I said in my previous mail, adding a parameter to say which counter
> you're updating, instead of adding another counter that's mutually
> exclusive with the other would make everything clearer.

Yes this "assert" is useless as is ... I'll remove it.
I understand you proposal of pgss_store refactoring, but I don't have
much time available now ... and I would like to check that performances
are not broken before any other modification ...

Regards
PAscal

--
Sent from: http://www.postgresql-archive.org/PostgreSQL-hackers-f1928748.html

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Ants Aasma 2019-03-27 20:51:16 Re: Enable data checksums by default
Previous Message Fabien COELHO 2019-03-27 20:31:30 Re: Progress reporting for pg_verify_checksums