Re: [HACKERS] Point in Time Recovery

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Klaus Naumann <kn(at)mgnet(dot)de>, markw(at)osdl(dot)org, pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Point in Time Recovery
Date: 2004-07-29 17:16:05
Message-ID: 15535.1091121365@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-admin pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches

Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> Now, if you say people will rarely turn archiving on/off, then one
> parameter seems to make more sense.

I really can't envision a situation where people would do that. If you
need PITR at all then you need it 24x7.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-admin by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2004-07-29 17:33:35 Re: [HACKERS] Point in Time Recovery
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2004-07-29 17:07:51 Re: [HACKERS] Point in Time Recovery

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2004-07-29 17:33:35 Re: [HACKERS] Point in Time Recovery
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2004-07-29 17:07:51 Re: [HACKERS] Point in Time Recovery

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2004-07-29 17:25:19 Re: [HACKERS] win32 crash in initdb
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2004-07-29 17:12:14 Re: Admin functions contrib