| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
| Cc: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, Rod Taylor <rbt(at)rbt(dot)ca>, Peter Mount <peter(at)retep(dot)org(dot)uk>, Justin Clift <justin(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Dan Langille <dan(at)langille(dot)org>, Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net>, Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: psql and readline |
| Date: | 2003-01-09 21:43:27 |
| Message-ID: | 15534.1042148607@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> writes:
> Tom Lane writes:
>> The case I find interesting is where you're using plain "\e" to
>> re-edit a query interactively. If this query never gets into the
>> history buffer then you're lost: you won't be able to pull it back
>> for re-editing a second time.
> If you call \e again immediately then you edit the previous command.
But it'd be nice to have some *history*, ie be able to pull back older
commands.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2003-01-09 21:48:27 | Re: Dollar in identifiers |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2003-01-09 21:04:58 | Re: Question about DEADLOCK |