Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> writes:
> I thought it'd be nice to have a test for this, particularly because it's not
> clear that the behaviour is consistent across openssl versions.
Perhaps, but ...
> To deal with that, I changed the test to instead check if "not accept SSL
> connection: Success" is not logged.
... testing only that much seems entirely not worth the cycles, given the
shape of the patches we both just made. If we can't rely on "errno != 0"
to ensure we won't get "Success", there is one heck of a lot of other
code that will be broken worse than this.
regards, tom lane