Re: syscache entries out of order

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Mark Dilger <hornschnorter(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: syscache entries out of order
Date: 2017-05-30 22:48:19
Message-ID: 15494.1496184499@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Mark Dilger <hornschnorter(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> Just FYI, as of 665d1fad99e7b11678b0d5fa24d2898424243cd6, syscache.h
> entries are not in alphabetical order, which violates the coding standard
> specified in the comment for these entries. In particular, it is the PUBLICATION
> and SUBSCRIPTION entries that are mis-ordered.

Agreed, this is the project convention and we should follow it.

> Sorry for my pedantry. Patch attached.

Patch pushed.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Mark Dilger 2017-05-30 22:50:04 Re: Use of non-restart-safe storage by temp_tablespaces
Previous Message Thomas Munro 2017-05-30 22:23:56 Re: Race conditions with WAL sender PID lookups