Re: Connection slots reserved for replication

From: Oleksii Kliukin <alexk(at)hintbits(dot)com>
To: Alexander Kukushkin <cyberdemn(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Petr Jelinek <petr(dot)jelinek(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, magnus(at)hagander(dot)net, Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com>, Kyotaro HORIGUCHI <horiguchi(dot)kyotaro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, "PostgreSQL-development" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Connection slots reserved for replication
Date: 2019-01-15 12:30:30
Message-ID: 1547555430.712645.1635083104.5E0EE12B@webmail.messagingengine.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Jan 2, 2019, at 12:36, Alexander Kukushkin wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, 2 Jan 2019 at 12:17, Oleksii Kliukin <alexk(at)hintbits(dot)com> wrote:
>
> > Thank you. Attached the new version(called it v8) with the following changes to the documentation:
>
> Thank you for jumping on it. Your changes look good to me.
>
>
> I was also thinking about changing the value in PG_CONTROL_VERSION,
> because we added the new field into the control file, but decided to
> leave this change to committer.

Sounds reasonable, not sure what the 'official policy' is on this.

As there is no further reviews/issues found for almost 2 weeks since the last one, should we move it to RFC?

Cheers,
Oleksii

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Dave Cramer 2019-01-15 12:53:57 Re: Reviving the "Stopping logical replication protocol" patch from Vladimir Gordichuk
Previous Message Dmitry Dolgov 2019-01-15 12:29:30 Re: Pluggable Storage - Andres's take