| From: | Jim Finnerty <jfinnert(at)amazon(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Detect missing combined indexes (automatically) |
| Date: | 2019-01-12 15:47:09 |
| Message-ID: | 1547308029438-0.post@n3.nabble.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-performance |
By the term 'combined indexes', do you mean a multi-column index, or a set of
single-column indexes that need to be combined by the planner? What
methodology are you using to recommend missing indexes?
You may be able to enlist help from more people if you provide a specific
example of a query that you have that isn't performing well (with the
explain (analyze, verbose, buffers) plan on https://explain.depesz.com/),
the index(es) that improve performance (with the plan on
https://explain.depesz.com/), and the 'single index' tools / methodology
that you're currently using to suggest missing indexes.
/Jim F
-----
Jim Finnerty, AWS, Amazon Aurora PostgreSQL
--
Sent from: http://www.postgresql-archive.org/PostgreSQL-performance-f2050081.html
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Thomas Kellerer | 2019-01-14 07:19:50 | Re: Detect missing combined indexes (automatically) |
| Previous Message | Etsuro Fujita | 2019-01-11 12:50:19 | Re: Query with high planning time at version 11.1 compared versions 10.5 and 11.0 |