Re: ODBC Rewrite

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>
Cc: markw(at)mohawksoft(dot)com, pgsql-odbc(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: ODBC Rewrite
Date: 2004-12-07 15:32:25
Message-ID: 15393.1102433545@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-odbc

Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net> writes:
> That's not particularly relevant- the question is if the existing libpq
> API is sufficient for the ODBC driver or not.

And even more to the point, whether extending it wouldn't be a better
answer than writing a whole new API (and new library?). There are
definitely features of the V3 protocol that are not accessible through
libpq at the moment, but that is due to lack of time to add appropriate
API to libpq, not any fundamental objection to extending libpq.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-odbc by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message markw 2004-12-07 15:56:30 Re: ODBC Rewrite
Previous Message Stephen Frost 2004-12-07 15:02:14 Re: ODBC Rewrite