Re: [PATCH] Extend ALTER OPERATOR to support adding commutator, negator, hashes, and merges

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Tommy Pavlicek <tommypav122(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Dagfinn Ilmari Mannsåker <ilmari(at)ilmari(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org, Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Extend ALTER OPERATOR to support adding commutator, negator, hashes, and merges
Date: 2023-06-23 11:21:46
Message-ID: 15382.1687519306@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Tommy Pavlicek <tommypav122(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> I've added a single patch here: https://commitfest.postgresql.org/43/4389/

> It wasn't obvious whether I should create a second commitfest entry
> because I've included 2 patches so I've just done 1 to begin with. On
> that note, is it preferred here to split patches of this size into
> separate patches, and if so, additionally, separate threads?

No, our commitfest infrastructure is unable to deal with patches that have
interdependencies unless they're presented in a single email. So just use
one thread, and be sure to attach all the patches each time.

(BTW, while you seem to have gotten away with it so far, it's usually
advisable to name the patch files like 0001-foo.patch, 0002-bar.patch,
etc, to make sure the cfbot understands what order to apply them in.)

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andrew Dunstan 2023-06-23 11:28:52 Re: Migration database from mysql to postgress
Previous Message Tommy Pavlicek 2023-06-23 10:34:38 Re: [PATCH] Extend ALTER OPERATOR to support adding commutator, negator, hashes, and merges