Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> On Fri, Feb 12, 2016 at 11:20 AM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>> Add missing "static" qualifier.
>>
>> Per buildfarm member pademelon.
> Gah. Sorry I keep missing these.
It's a pain that gcc won't warn about it. On the other hand, it's
probably only neatnik-ism on my part to care; I do not know of any
compilers that would actually give an error. It only seems worth
fixing to me because whether a function is static or not is important
information, so I like functions to be accurately labeled.
regards, tom lane