| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
| Cc: | Robert Creager <Robert(dot)Creager(at)Oracle(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Re: [Pgbuildfarm-members] CREATE FUNCTION hang on test machine polecat on HEAD |
| Date: | 2011-06-07 16:40:48 |
| Message-ID: | 15375.1307464848@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | buildfarm-members pgsql-hackers |
Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> writes:
> On 06/07/2011 12:35 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
>> You sure it's hung on that statement, and not the following one?
>> The following one would be trying to load plperlu into a backend
>> already using plperl, which is an area that it wouldn't exactly
>> be surprising to find platform-dependent issues in.
> That's true, but he has log_statement = all, so the statement should be
> logged before it's executed. And the stack trace he's sent shows that's
> the statement being executed.
Yeah, the stack trace destroyed that theory.
> It seems to be hung in Perl_get_hash_seed().
Which is not our code, of course. Who wants to dig into perl guts?
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Alex Hunsaker | 2011-06-07 17:18:24 | Re: [Pgbuildfarm-members] CREATE FUNCTION hang on test machine polecat on HEAD |
| Previous Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2011-06-07 16:33:31 | Re: Re: [Pgbuildfarm-members] CREATE FUNCTION hang on test machine polecat on HEAD |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Simon Riggs | 2011-06-07 16:51:28 | Re: reducing the overhead of frequent table locks - now, with WIP patch |
| Previous Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2011-06-07 16:33:31 | Re: Re: [Pgbuildfarm-members] CREATE FUNCTION hang on test machine polecat on HEAD |