From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Adam Mackler <pgsql-general(at)mackler(dot)org> |
Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Re: User-defined operator function: what parameter type to use for uncast character string? |
Date: | 2014-08-01 15:45:18 |
Message-ID: | 1536.1406907918@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
Adam Mackler <pgsql-general(at)mackler(dot)org> writes:
> One final question: the 'CREATE CAST' command got my interest. I'm
> assuming that when the docs say it 'performs a conversion between two
> data types,' that the meaning of "data type" includes only those
> created using 'CREATE TYPE' and excludes domains. If I am mistaken on
> that point I would be grateful to learn of that mistake.
I wouldn't recommend it. The expected behavior of up-casting to a domain
from its base type is that the value doesn't change but the domain's
current check constraints are applied. I think that if you defined
a cast via CREATE CAST it would override that behavior (I've not verified
this though), and it would then be entirely on your head whether the
resulting value was actually a legal member of the domain.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Vik Fearing | 2014-08-01 16:28:57 | Re: Feature proposal and discussion: full-fledged column/function equivalence |
Previous Message | Larry White | 2014-08-01 15:44:18 | jsonb creation functions? |