| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Gregory Stark <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
| Cc: | "Pavel Stehule" <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>, "PostgreSQL-development" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, "Josh Berkus" <Josh(dot)Berkus(at)sun(dot)com>, "David Fetter" <david(at)fetter(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Proposal: real procedures again (8.4) |
| Date: | 2007-10-27 13:36:10 |
| Message-ID: | 15329.1193492170@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Gregory Stark <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> writes:
> "Pavel Stehule" <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
>> Why new calling convention? I would to support byref variables and
>> then I have to carry memory context info ... and maybe some others
> I think first you have to invent something for the by-ref parameter to refer
> to.
Most of that sounded to me like a proposal to re-invent ecpg. If there
were such a large demand for doing things that way, there would be many
more users of ecpg than bare libpq. AFAICT, though, *very* few people
use ecpg.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2007-10-27 13:46:03 | Re: min/max planner optimization |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2007-10-27 13:32:02 | Re: Definition of function base_yylex in version 8.1.4 |