Re: Patch for pg_dump

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: "Dany DeBontridder" <dany118(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Patch for pg_dump
Date: 2007-03-20 17:25:23
Message-ID: 15327.1174411523@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

"Dany DeBontridder" <dany118(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> Usage:
> pg_dump -Q function_name DATABASE export function_name
> pg_dump -Q DATABASE export all the functions

What of overloading? And your switch syntax seems ambiguous anyway.

btw, I see no patch here...

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2007-03-20 17:37:26 Re: Buildfarm feature request: some way to track/classify failures
Previous Message Tom Lane 2007-03-20 17:23:50 Re: Question about tuplestore clients