From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Charles Randle <caspanis(at)cybervale(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-interfaces(at)postgreSQL(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: [INTERFACES] Problems with postgres V6.5.3 large objects |
Date: | 1999-12-06 06:08:33 |
Message-ID: | 15297.944460513@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-interfaces |
Charles Randle <caspanis(at)cybervale(dot)com> writes:
> In terms of access to the large object, my class maintains an array of
> objects which are currently open (Oid,name,file descriptor etc ..).
> Whenever access is needed to any large object an accessor method
> simply executes 'lo_read'/lo_write' or lo_seek as is desired . If the
> object is not on the active list then another method opens the object
> (using lo_open ).As is to be expected the destructor of the class
> closes all open objects .
Sounds reasonable as far as it goes. My best guess at this point is a
client-side memory stomp that is clobbering libpq's record of which
function OID to call for each available LO operation. See
interfaces/libpq/fe-lobj.c, particularly lo_initialize() and its
callers, and then try tracing through the client with a debugger
to see where the conn->lobjfuncs struct gets clobbered.
Good luck!
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Michael Meskes | 1999-12-06 06:54:42 | Re: [INTERFACES] Spanish format on date and numbers |
Previous Message | Charles Randle | 1999-12-06 05:44:43 | Re: [INTERFACES] Problems with postgres V6.5.3 large objects |