| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Automatic PG_PRINTF_ATTRIBUTE |
| Date: | 2014-11-22 01:13:17 |
| Message-ID: | 15287.1416618797@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> writes:
> On 2014-11-21 03:12:14 -0500, Noah Misch wrote:
>> ... I'm
>> increasingly using an affected compiler, because it builds twice as quickly as
>> today's gcc.
> No objections to the patch itself, but this seems like quite the odd
> approach. Sure those old compilers might be a bit faster, but they also
> report many fewer legitimate warnings and such.
> A full tree doesn't take that long? A full recompile sess than 40s here
> and src/backend alone is much faster. ISTM that if it's currently too
> slow, improving the concurrency of the build a bit more is a wiser
> path...
As far as that goes, ccache is a miracle worker. But I don't know
how well it works on Windows :-(
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Noah Misch | 2014-11-22 01:30:25 | Re: Automatic PG_PRINTF_ATTRIBUTE |
| Previous Message | Andres Freund | 2014-11-22 00:53:10 | Re: Automatic PG_PRINTF_ATTRIBUTE |