Re: LOCK for non-tables

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Tatsuo Ishii <ishii(at)postgresql(dot)org>, fgp(at)phlo(dot)org, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: LOCK for non-tables
Date: 2011-01-15 01:03:10
Message-ID: 15269.1295053390@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> Me, too. But I don't agree with your particular choice of small
> syntax adjustment. Maybe we should just let the issue drop for now.
> Nobody's actually complained about this that I can recall; it's just a
> comment that's been sitting there in pg_dump for ages, and I was
> inspired to think of it again because of the SQL/MED work. I'm not
> sufficiently in love with this idea to walk through fire for it.

Agreed. Once there's some pressing need for it, it'll be easier to make
the case that some amount of incompatibility is acceptable.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Simon Riggs 2011-01-15 01:09:32 Re: Named restore points
Previous Message Tom Lane 2011-01-15 01:00:03 Re: Add support for logging the current role