| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Christopher Kings-Lynne <chris(dot)kings-lynne(at)calorieking(dot)com> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com>, Bernd Helmle <mailings(at)oopsware(dot)de>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, "Patches (PostgreSQL)" <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Susanne Ebrecht <susanne(dot)ebrecht(at)credativ(dot)de> |
| Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] 8.2 features? |
| Date: | 2006-07-19 03:32:34 |
| Message-ID: | 15212.1153279954@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-docs pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
Christopher Kings-Lynne <chris(dot)kings-lynne(at)calorieking(dot)com> writes:
> Strange. Last time I checked I thought MySQL dump used 'multivalue
> lists in inserts' for dumps, for the same reason that we use COPY
I think Andrew identified the critical point upthread: they don't try
to put an unlimited number of rows into one INSERT, only a megabyte
or so's worth. Typical klugy-but-effective mysql design approach ...
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Joe Conway | 2006-07-19 04:20:05 | Re: [HACKERS] 8.2 features? |
| Previous Message | Christopher Kings-Lynne | 2006-07-19 01:20:29 | Re: [HACKERS] 8.2 features? |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2006-07-19 03:52:36 | Re: url for TODO item, is it right? |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2006-07-19 03:24:08 | Re: Progress bar updates |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Joe Conway | 2006-07-19 04:20:05 | Re: [HACKERS] 8.2 features? |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2006-07-19 02:52:02 | Re: modular pg_regress.sh |