"Pavel Stehule" <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> 2008/12/9 Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>:
>> ... and it breaks an operator that's already in use.
> what is acceptable workaround? I unhappy, so this symbol was used for
> this minor contrib module (for this operator doesn't exists regress
> test).
If you could prove that it were *only* being used by this contrib module
then I might hold still for replacing it. But you can't. The odds are
good that people have custom data types using similarly-named operators.
regards, tom lane