Re: planstats.sgml

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Tatsuo Ishii <ishii(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: planstats.sgml
Date: 2016-02-16 00:00:42
Message-ID: 15174.1455580842@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Tatsuo Ishii <ishii(at)postgresql(dot)org> writes:
> While reading planstats.sgml, I encounted a sentence which I don't
> understand.

> These numbers are current as of the last <command>VACUUM</> or
> <command>ANALYZE</> on the table. The planner then fetches the
> actual current number of pages in the table (this is a cheap operation,
> not requiring a table scan). If that is different from
> <structfield>relpages</structfield> then
> <structfield>reltuples</structfield> is scaled accordingly to
> arrive at a current number-of-rows estimate. In this case the value of
> <structfield>relpages</structfield> is up-to-date so the rows estimate is
> the same as <structfield>reltuples</structfield>.

> I don't understand the last sentence (In this case...). For me it
> seems it is talking about the case when replages is not different from
> what the planner fetches from the table. If so, why "In this case"?

I think what it meant is "In the example above, ...". Feel free to
change it if you think that is clearer.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tatsuo Ishii 2016-02-16 00:09:52 Re: planstats.sgml
Previous Message Alvaro Herrera 2016-02-15 23:47:12 Re: innocuous: pgbench does FD_ISSET on invalid socket