Re: PostgreSQL crashes with SIGSEGV

From: Aleksandr Parfenov <a(dot)parfenov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>
To: pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Cc: Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie>
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL crashes with SIGSEGV
Date: 2018-01-16 07:52:26
Message-ID: 151608914608.25640.2144132915573008595.pgcf@coridan.postgresql.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugs pgsql-hackers

The following review has been posted through the commitfest application:
make installcheck-world: tested, passed
Implements feature: tested, passed
Spec compliant: tested, passed
Documentation: tested, passed

Hi,

All information is related to WIP-tuplesort-memcontext-fix.patch.
The patch applies and fixes the bug on REL9_6_STABLE and LGTM.

However, REL9_5_STABLE affected as well and the patch doesn't applicable to it.
But it may be another entry because the difference in tuplesort may cause some changes in the fix too.

The new status of this patch is: Ready for Committer

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Amit Langote 2018-01-16 08:08:50 Re: [Sender Address Forgery]Re: [Sender Address Forgery]Re: [HACKERS] path toward faster partition pruning
Previous Message Jeff Davis 2018-01-16 07:49:17 Re: Rangejoin rebased

Browse pgsql-bugs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Stephen Frost 2018-01-17 12:38:32 Re: [HACKERS] [BUGS] Bug in Physical Replication Slots (at least 9.5)?
Previous Message Pavel Stehule 2018-01-15 18:05:47 Re: BUG #15012: psql doesn't use server's default port