Re: Non-superuser subscription owners

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com>
Cc: Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>, Mark Dilger <mark(dot)dilger(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Non-superuser subscription owners
Date: 2022-01-08 17:57:18
Message-ID: 1514479.1641664638@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

... btw, I'd like to complain that this new test script consumes
a completely excessive amount of time. On my fairly-new primary
workstation:

[12:48:00] t/027_nosuperuser.pl ............... ok 22146 ms ( 0.02 usr 0.00 sys + 1.12 cusr 0.95 csys = 2.09 CPU)

The previously-slowest script in the subscription suite is

[12:48:23] t/100_bugs.pl ...................... ok 7048 ms ( 0.00 usr 0.00 sys + 2.85 cusr 0.99 csys = 3.84 CPU)

and the majority of the scripts clock in at more like 2 to 4 seconds.
So I don't think I'm out of line in saying that this test is consuming
an order of magnitude more time than is justified. I do not wish to
see this much time added to every check-world run till kingdom come
for this one feature/issue.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Fabien COELHO 2022-01-08 18:32:36 Re: psql - add SHOW_ALL_RESULTS option
Previous Message Tom Lane 2022-01-08 17:37:49 Re: Non-superuser subscription owners