Re: Anyone working on better transaction locking?

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Hannu Krosing <hannu(at)tm(dot)ee>
Cc: Shridhar Daithankar <shridhar_daithankar(at)persistent(dot)co(dot)in>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Anyone working on better transaction locking?
Date: 2003-04-14 03:37:40
Message-ID: 1514.1050291460@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hannu Krosing <hannu(at)tm(dot)ee> writes:
> I vaguely remember some messages about getting PG to work well on NUMA
> computers, which by definition should have non-uniformly cheap access to
> shared data structures.

My recollection of the thread is that we didn't know how to do it ;-)

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message milimeter@163.com 2003-04-14 05:16:32 Problem about pgsql's column alias
Previous Message Tom Lane 2003-04-14 03:10:33 Re: compile warnings in CVS HEAD