From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Rushabh Lathia <rushabh(dot)lathia(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
Subject: | Re: Replacing pg_depend PIN entries with a fixed range check |
Date: | 2021-05-26 16:45:38 |
Message-ID: | 1509334.1622047538@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> So I think your proposal of allowing genbki-assigned OIDs to be reused
> in different catalogs is probably a pretty good one, but I wonder if
> we could just rejigger things so that collations just get normal OIDs
> > 16384.
Hm. I can't readily think of a non-hack way of making that happen.
It's also unclear to me how it'd interact with assignment of OIDs
to regular user objects. Maybe we'll have to go there eventually,
but I'm not in a hurry to.
Meanwhile, I'll draft a patch for the other thing.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2021-05-26 17:28:07 | Re: CALL versus procedures with output-only arguments |
Previous Message | Matthias van de Meent | 2021-05-26 16:43:37 | Re: Add ZSON extension to /contrib/ |