Re: Non-overlapping updates blocking each other

From: Seamus Abshere <seamus(at)abshere(dot)net>
To: Melvin Davidson <melvin6925(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Non-overlapping updates blocking each other
Date: 2017-10-15 12:01:32
Message-ID: 1508068892.2188016.1139279144.0E7EF58B@webmail.messagingengine.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

> On Sat, Oct 14, 2017 at 10:30 AM, Seamus Abshere <seamus(at)abshere(dot)net>
> > UPDATE [...] WHERE id BETWEEN 'ff000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000000' AND
> > 'ff0fffff-ffff-ffff-ffff-ffffffffffff'
> > and
> > UPDATE [...] WHERE id BETWEEN 'f8c00000-0000-0000-0000-000000000000' AND
> > 'f8ffffff-ffff-ffff-ffff-ffffffffffff'
> > Yet one blocks the other one. How is this possible?

On Sat, Oct 14, 2017, at 12:32 PM, Melvin Davidson wrote:
> More than likely, the optimizer has determined that a table scan is best,
> in which case it will use a table lock.
> You can also execute the following query and check the wait_event_type to
> verify.

hi Melvin,

Very interesting! The result:

wait_event | page
wait_event_type | Lock

So I guess this means that the ids don't overlap, but they are sometimes
found in the same page, and the whole page gets locked?

Any narrative (pretending I don't know anything) would be very helpful.

Thanks!
Seamus

PS. I do a SELECT 1 FROM x WHERE [ID_RANGE] FOR UPDATE right before the
update, but that's to prevent a race condition. The id ranges still
don't overlap.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alban Hertroys 2017-10-15 12:02:16 Re: EAV Designs for Multi-Tenant Applications
Previous Message legrand legrand 2017-10-15 10:07:53 Re: SAP Application deployment on PostgreSQL