| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Claudio Natoli <claudio(dot)natoli(at)memetrics(dot)com>, "'pgsql-hackers-win32(at)postgresql(dot)org'" <pgsql-hackers-win32(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Win32 regression test status |
| Date: | 2004-03-08 19:26:55 |
| Message-ID: | 15067.1078774015@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers-win32 |
Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> Agreed, we don't add them to all joins, but don't we historically add
> ORDER BY to queries that are shown to be sensitive to qsort
> implementations on various platforms? Are you suggesting we create a
> separate regression output file for that platform?
I'm not suggesting any particular solution yet, just pointing out that
there are reasons to look for alternatives rather than automatically
adding ORDER BY.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Claudio Natoli | 2004-03-09 01:08:34 | Re: Win32 regression test status |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2004-03-08 19:21:04 | Re: Win32 regression test status |