Re: LLVM / clang

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
Cc: "P(dot) Caillaud" <peufeu(at)peufeu(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: LLVM / clang
Date: 2010-06-10 13:52:49
Message-ID: 15062.1276177969@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> writes:
> Quick testing shows that clang doesn't get through the configure stage
> on this Debian system -- it looks like some amount of better integration
> with glibc might be needed. Building with llvm-gcc works fine, but I
> understand that using llvm-gcc with native code generation isn't all
> that different from using gcc itself, so that's not a surprising result.
> The only issue is that the float8 regression test fails, so it is
> apparently not *exactly* the same.

There's a buildfarm animal using llvm-gcc, and it passes just fine ...
so the float8 failure sounds to me like another integration problem.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2010-06-10 13:57:21 Re: warning message in standby
Previous Message Robert Haas 2010-06-10 13:29:41 Re: [PERFORM] No hash join across partitioned tables?