Re: Union test case broken in make check?

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Kenneth Marshall <ktm(at)rice(dot)edu>
Cc: Emmanuel Cecchet <manu(at)asterdata(dot)com>, Emmanuel Cecchet <Emmanuel(dot)Cecchet(at)asterdata(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Union test case broken in make check?
Date: 2009-11-20 05:49:20
Message-ID: 15055.1258696160@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Kenneth Marshall <ktm(at)rice(dot)edu> writes:
> Without an order by, the order is not defined.

Yeah, but with the same data and the same software it should generally
give the same result; as evidenced by the fact that these same
regression tests have worked for most people for years. There's
something odd happening on Emmanuel's machine. Maybe he's changed
the hashing algorithms or some planner cost parameters?

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2009-11-20 05:56:52 Re: Syntax for partitioning
Previous Message Nikhil Sontakke 2009-11-20 05:44:58 Re: Syntax for partitioning