| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com |
| Cc: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, henk de wit <henk53602(at)hotmail(dot)com>, pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Using multiple cores for index creation? |
| Date: | 2009-01-30 01:25:16 |
| Message-ID: | 15052.1233278716@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-performance |
"Joshua D. Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> writes:
> On Thu, 2009-01-29 at 18:09 -0500, Robert Haas wrote:
>> Andrew Dunstan has been working on this problem. His latest parallel
>> restore patch can be found here:
>>
>> http://archives.postgresql.org/message-id/4977E070.6070604@dunslane.net
> Yeah but that isn't useful for 8.3.
Sure it is. Andrew has made a point of making sure that the improved
version of pg_restore can work against older servers (not sure how far
back, but it's definitely supposed to work with 8.3).
> What can be done in this specific
> situation is to make sure you dump with the -Fc option...
You're essentially proposing a manual reimplementation of Andrew's
patch ...
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Scott Marlowe | 2009-01-30 07:53:37 | Re: PG performance in high volume environment (many INSERTs and lots of aggregation reporting) |
| Previous Message | henk de wit | 2009-01-30 00:02:55 | Re: Using multiple cores for index creation? |