Re: Adding "large" to PG_TEST_EXTRA

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Adding "large" to PG_TEST_EXTRA
Date: 2023-02-13 21:11:44
Message-ID: 1504610.1676322704@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> writes:
> On 2023-02-13 14:55:45 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
>> bigdisk, bigcpu?

> Works for me.

> I'll probably just add bigdisk as part of adding a test for bulk relation
> extensions, mentioning in a comment that we might want bigcpu if we have a
> test for it?

No objection here.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2023-02-13 21:24:09 Re: REASSIGN OWNED vs ALTER TABLE OWNER TO permission inconsistencies
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2023-02-13 21:05:04 Re: proposal: psql: psql variable BACKEND_PID