Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> writes:
> This is a patch to make use of RELKIND_HAS_STORAGE() where appropriate,
> instead of listing out the relkinds individually. No behavior change is
> intended.
> This was originally part of the patch from [0], but it seems worth
> moving forward independently.
Passes eyeball examination. I did not try to search for other places
where RELKIND_HAS_STORAGE should be used.
regards, tom lane