| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Teodor Sigaev <teodor(at)sigaev(dot)ru> |
| Cc: | Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: patch: tsearch - some memory diet |
| Date: | 2010-10-06 23:36:42 |
| Message-ID: | 15008.1286408202@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Teodor Sigaev <teodor(at)sigaev(dot)ru> writes:
>> on 32bit from 27MB (3399 blocks) to 13MB (1564 blocks)
>> on 64bit from 55MB to cca 27MB.
> Good results. But, I think, there are more places in ispell to use hold_memory():
> - affixes and affix tree
> - regis (REGex for ISpell, regis.c)
I fixed the affix stuff as much as possible (some of the structures are
re-palloc'd so they can't easily be included). It appears that hacking
up regis, or any of the remaining allocations, wouldn't be worth the
trouble. Using the Czech dictionary on a 32-bit machine, I see about
16MB going through the compacted-alloc code and only about 375K going
through regular small palloc's.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Robert Haas | 2010-10-06 23:44:46 | Re: patch: tsearch - some memory diet |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2010-10-06 23:33:45 | Re: patch: tsearch - some memory diet |