Re: pg_get_triggerdef in pg_dump

From: "Christopher Kings-Lynne" <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au>
To: "Andreas Pflug" <Andreas(dot)Pflug(at)web(dot)de>, "Rod Taylor" <rbt(at)rbt(dot)ca>
Cc: "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "Hackers" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: pg_get_triggerdef in pg_dump
Date: 2003-06-18 01:39:54
Message-ID: 14e101c3353a$894101a0$6500a8c0@fhp.internal
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> this arguments are quite academic.

You what!

> On one side, this could be
> restricted, thats what pg_depends is good for (this already happens for
> inherited tables).
> On the other side, how often do you rename columns or tables?

You what!

> On mssql, nobody cares.

You what!

> If you fool around with names, your views will
> be broken without warning. pgsql could be better easily.
> I'd really prefer to have full view sources available rather than the
> gimmick of stable views despite renamed cols/tabs.

Gimmick! You what!!!!!!

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Francisco Figueiredo Jr. 2003-06-18 02:26:07 Fields float4 don't return any row when selecting a value with a .
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2003-06-18 01:12:56 Re: [HACKERS] sa_family_t in cygwin compile of cvs