| From: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>,Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>,"pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Remove superuser() checks from pgstattuple |
| Date: | 2016-09-05 01:35:29 |
| Message-ID: | 149FA18A-C7B2-407C-B433-EAAFA97DF302@anarazel.de |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On September 4, 2016 6:33:30 PM PDT, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> writes:
>> On 2016-09-04 21:09:41 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>>> Hm, couldn't we do that automatically? At least in the case where
>only
>>> one base-version script is available?
>
>> You mean determining the baseversion? Hm, yes, that might work. But
>I'm
>> not sure how much we can rely on no earlier scripts being already
>> installed or such. Seems like a problem you'd possibly only encounter
>in
>> the field or dirty development environments.
>
>Actually, why would we care? Pick one, with some tiebreaker rules
>(shortest update path, for starters).
Fair point.
> I think nearly all of the
>infrastructure for this is already there in extension.c.
Yes, it doesn't sound very hard...
Andres
--
Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Mithun Cy | 2016-09-05 02:29:02 | Re: Patch: Implement failover on libpq connect level. |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2016-09-05 01:33:30 | Re: Remove superuser() checks from pgstattuple |