Re: Revisiting NAMEDATALEN

From: Emrul <emrul(at)emrul(dot)com>
To: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Revisiting NAMEDATALEN
Date: 2017-07-03 18:46:51
Message-ID: 1499107611346-5969860.post@n3.nabble.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Yes, for the example given in the Reddit post I would tend to agree. This is
one of those issues where for the most part the solution is better naming
conventions but for the few instances where this isn't possible it is a
right pain.

--
View this message in context: http://www.postgresql-archive.org/Revisiting-NAMEDATALEN-tp5969858p5969860.html
Sent from the PostgreSQL - hackers mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2017-07-03 18:50:16 Re: Error while copying a large file in pg_rewind
Previous Message Joshua D. Drake 2017-07-03 18:36:37 Re: Revisiting NAMEDATALEN