Re: pg_dump and large files - is this a problem?

From: Giles Lean <giles(at)nemeton(dot)com(dot)au>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, Philip Warner <pjw(at)rhyme(dot)com(dot)au>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Subject: Re: pg_dump and large files - is this a problem?
Date: 2002-10-24 01:14:19
Message-ID: 14988.1035422059@hpchs.cup.hp.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers


Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:

> OK, well BSD/OS now works, but I wonder if there are any other quad
> off_t OS's out there without fseeko.

NetBSD prior to 1.6, released September 14, 2002. (Source: CVS logs.)

OpenBSD prior to 2.7, released June 15, 2000. (Source: release notes.)

FreeBSD has had fseeko() for some time, but I'm not sure which release
introduced it -- perhaps 3.2.0, released May, 1999. (Source: CVS logs.)

Regards,

Giles

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2002-10-24 01:22:29 Standalone backend doesn't read postgresql.conf
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2002-10-24 01:02:46 Re: One 7.3 item left