Re: An attempt to reduce WALWriteLock contention

From: jasrajd <jasrajd(at)microsoft(dot)com>
To: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: An attempt to reduce WALWriteLock contention
Date: 2017-06-21 07:57:32
Message-ID: 1498031852888-5967786.post@n3.nabble.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

We are also seeing contention on the walwritelock and repeated writes to the
same offset if we move the flush outside the lock in the Azure environment.
pgbench doesn't scale beyond ~8 cores without saturating the IOPs or
bandwidth. Is there more work being done in this area?

--
View this message in context: http://www.postgresql-archive.org/An-attempt-to-reduce-WALWriteLock-contention-tp5935907p5967786.html
Sent from the PostgreSQL - hackers mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Etsuro Fujita 2017-06-21 07:59:43 Useless code in ExecInitModifyTable
Previous Message Shubham Barai 2017-06-21 07:52:50 Re: GSoC 2017 : Patch for predicate locking in Gist index