Re: AW: AW: AW: Re: tinterval - operator problems on AIX

From: Pete Forman <pete(dot)forman(at)westerngeco(dot)com>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
Cc: Zeugswetter Andreas SB <ZeugswetterA(at)wien(dot)spardat(dot)at>, <lockhart(at)fourpalms(dot)org>, "'pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org'" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: AW: AW: AW: Re: tinterval - operator problems on AIX
Date: 2001-01-22 10:33:35
Message-ID: 14956.3199.320462.158001@kryten.bedford.waii.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Peter Eisentraut writes:
> What if someone has a binary PostgreSQL package installed, then
> updates his time library to something supposedly binary compatible
> and finds out that PostgreSQL still doesn't use the enhanced
> capabilities?

You are too generous. If someone downloads a binary package it should
not be expected to be able to take advantage of non standard features
of the platform. It is reasonable that they should compile it from
source to get the most from it.
--
Pete Forman -./\.- Disclaimer: This post is originated
WesternGeco -./\.- by myself and does not represent
pete(dot)forman(at)westerngeco(dot)com -./\.- opinion of Schlumberger, Baker
http://www.crosswinds.net/~petef -./\.- Hughes or their divisions.

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Zeugswetter Andreas SB 2001-01-22 10:50:20 AW: like and optimization
Previous Message Patrick Welche 2001-01-22 10:29:33 Strange..