Re: FW: Postgresql on win32

From: Pete Forman <pete(dot)forman(at)westerngeco(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Magnus Hagander <mha(at)sollentuna(dot)net>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: FW: Postgresql on win32
Date: 2001-01-22 16:19:36
Message-ID: 14956.23960.81056.680598@kryten.bedford.waii.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Tom Lane writes:
> That'd be OK with me. I don't suppose Win32 has "sed" though :-(

Cygwin does. We can worry about native support for PostgreSQL later ;-)
--
Pete Forman -./\.- Disclaimer: This post is originated
WesternGeco -./\.- by myself and does not represent
pete(dot)forman(at)westerngeco(dot)com -./\.- opinion of Schlumberger, Baker
http://www.crosswinds.net/~petef -./\.- Hughes or their divisions.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2001-01-22 16:27:03 Re: Re: MySQL and BerkleyDB (fwd)
Previous Message Dmitri E. Gurevich 2001-01-22 16:13:08 Strange error in PHP/Postgre on RadHat?