From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
Cc: | Greg Smith <gsmith(at)gregsmith(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers list <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] Patch review |
Date: | 2008-02-13 15:27:35 |
Message-ID: | 14951.1202916455@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-www |
Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> writes:
> Greg Smith wrote:
>> If you look at how the archives store things, the threading in there
>> sometimes isn't sufficient to support this. As an example, I was just
>> trying to read all the messages in the "Group Commit" thread that Bruce
>> has tracked on "Patches Held For PostgreSQL 8.4", and for reasons I can't
>> figure out it's split into two threads in the archives.
> Perhaps it's because it was split in two by a monthly boundary? (I
> didn't look.)
Most likely. Somebody on the www team really ought to make an effort
to fix that sometime --- it reduces the value of the archives noticeably
if you can't rely on the thread links.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Dave Page | 2008-02-13 15:32:00 | Re: [HACKERS] Patch review |
Previous Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2008-02-13 12:12:10 | Re: Patch review |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Dave Page | 2008-02-13 15:32:00 | Re: [HACKERS] Patch review |
Previous Message | Selena Deckelmann | 2008-02-13 14:33:22 | request for 2 mailing lists and archives.postgresql.org updates |