| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut(at)gmail(dot)com>, Sadhuprasad Patro <b(dot)sadhu(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: [Bug] Logical Replication failing if the DateStyle is different in Publisher & Subscriber |
| Date: | 2021-10-18 03:35:24 |
| Message-ID: | 1493647.1634528124@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> On Thu, Oct 14, 2021 at 8:50 PM Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>> Looks like a problem to me, I think for fixing this, on logical
>> replication connection always set subscriber's DateStlyle, with that
>> the walsender will always send the data in the same DateStyle that
>> worker understands and then we are good.
> +1
An alternative that wouldn't require a network round trip is for the
publisher to set its own datestyle to ISO/YMD. I'm pretty sure that
will be interpreted correctly regardless of the receiver's datestyle.
> Probably the same is true for IntervalStyle?
Not sure if an equivalent solution applies to intervals ...
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2021-10-18 03:41:35 | Re: [Bug] Logical Replication failing if the DateStyle is different in Publisher & Subscriber |
| Previous Message | Masahiko Sawada | 2021-10-18 03:26:48 | Re: [Bug] Logical Replication failing if the DateStyle is different in Publisher & Subscriber |