Re: Incremental / Level -1 backup in PG

From: rakeshkumar464 <rakeshkumar464(at)outlook(dot)com>
To: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Incremental / Level -1 backup in PG
Date: 2017-03-22 18:11:06
Message-ID: 1490206266771-5951343.post@n3.nabble.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

>note postgres' WAL archive is by block, not by transaction.

My understanding is that only the first time a block is updated after a
checkpoint,
is the entire block is written to the WAL logs. And for that
full_page_writes has to be set to ON.
The only other time PG writes entire block to the WAL is during the time of
backup regardless of full_page_writes setting.

AFAIK rest of the time, WAL takes only row changes. Otherwise PG will be
generating large number
of WAL logs.

I hope I am right :-)

> also note that postgres effectively does copy-on-write, since update's are
> treated
>as insert+delete, so the same blocks aren't written over and over nearly
>as much as they might be in the oracle storage model.

Good point.

--
View this message in context: http://www.postgresql-archive.org/Incremental-Level-1-backup-in-PG-tp5951072p5951343.html
Sent from the PostgreSQL - general mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Toby Corkindale 2017-03-23 01:06:51 pg_last_xact_replay_timestamp() sometimes reports unlikely, very large delays
Previous Message John R Pierce 2017-03-22 17:45:56 Re: Incremental / Level -1 backup in PG